On Becoming Expert
Posted in Interesting Articles with tags expert, learning, motivation, practice on May 8, 2008 by Brian DarvellI came across a terrific motivational post today through my del.icio.us hotlist.
http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/05/become-an-exper.html
The post is primarily about the method of ‘deliberate practice’ and becoming better at something through regularly timed conscience meticulous effort. I particularly found the post to be motivational and the comments at the bottom of the post just as good as reading the actual article.
While I do agree that deliberate practice is without question a primary requirement of becoming ‘expert’ or even ’skilled’ at whatever it is you are interested in there still is something to be said for natural ability.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/10/30/8391794/index.htm
This article at fortune is also a great motivational read on pushing oneself to achieve greatness or expertism but I do not completely agree that natural ability can be so quickly discarded or forgotten. It is undeniable to me that natural talent does exist in some things. Tiger Woods does work incredibly hard to get where he is but he did initially have a natural talent for swinging the golf club. Mozart is famed for his tours around Europe to all the royal courts where he would play both on the piano and violin blindfolded while a very young youth of some half dozen years of age. Yet, not all experts, nor even the ‘best’, in something need to be natural talents.
The true question to me is the relationship natural talent has to becoming adjusted to some skill at a very early age. Tiger Woods for instance was submitted to golf at 18 months of age. By the time of his third birthday he would have already spent half of his lifetime practicing golf. Is this the relative equivalent to a 20-year old golfer having practiced for 10 years? Furthermore, would Tiger Woods have been just as good a golfer today had his first initiation to golf been postponed from eighteen months to three or five or ten years? It is intriguing to think that early introduction to some ability leads to what people might call ‘natural ability’ at a later date in life. Meanwhile, would that person adapt a good skill at an older age, it is attributed to hard work rather than natural ability since the relative time needed to spend on learning something is of a completely different scale. These are intriguing thoughts to me with which I play devil’s advocate in favor of the Fortune article.
Another curious relationship is that of desire and motivation and their lead up to deliberate practice. If you can properly practice something deliberately, and not just practice by rote which leads to you gaining almost no value out of the practice, then I would argue that you must already require that motivation and desire to succeed. I don’t think the opposite is true where one may try deliberate practicing to eventually hope to gain that motivation — I don’t think it works this way. Motivation gives your mind the proper boost required for finding a reason to care for what it is you’re doing. Without it, even to some degree, you will find yourself thinking that all this effort and time that you are spending is somehow pointless and not required. You could easily be enjoying doing something else entirely.
